The drinking water consumed by the Irish population is systematically laced with the known neurotoxin fluoride, a policy numerous eminent specialists believe poses a grave danger to the health of men, women and children. Here, we pose a series of questions to the Minister in charge of fluoridation policy, Alex White. We believe the Irish people are entitled to the answers...
Hot Press has put various questions and concerns in relation to the policy of mandatory fluoridation of the water supply in Ireland to the Department of Health over the past several weeks. In particular, a series of questions was sent to the Department on the morning of March 4, with a request for a reply by close of business on March 7. No reply was received, nor was the communication even acknowledged by the department.
Against that background, Hot Press believes that it is appropriate to present all of the relevant questions via this Open Letter to the Minister in charge of fluoridation policy, Alex White. We are hereby requesting answers to the questions, which are set out below and which cover the areas dealt with in the questions already submitted, and some additional queries besides.
We are asking these questions in the belief that (a) there is a very serious issue of public health at stake; (b) there is a growing body of evidence that the policy of fluoridation of the water supply is unsafe; (c) the Department of Health has not given sufficient weight to this evidence; (d) in general, the authorities here are negligent in their failure to carry out the research necessary to test the systemic effects of the policy of fluoridation in Ireland as envisaged by S.6 of the 1960 Fluoridation Act; and (e) that the public has a right to know the answers to the questions which we are posing.
There is no valid reason why the Department of Health would refuse to answer our queries. Let us hope that they do so sooner rather than later.
LONG-TERM CONSUMPTION OF FLUORIDATED TAP WATER: IS IT SAFE?
1. What evidence does the Minister or the Department of Health have to prove that fluoride is safe for long-term daily consumption by humans? Note: since the Irish Expert Body on Fluorides and Health is without expertise in toxicology, we do not regard safety assurances from this source as an answer to this question.
2. Has the Dept carried out any research to ascertain the effects, other than in relation to tooth decay, of the fluoridation of the water supply in Ireland? If not, why not? And on what basis has the claim been made that the policy is having no adverse health impacts on Irish people’s health?
3. Does the Dept of Health know what the average level of fluoride is in the urine, blood, bone and hair of people in this State?
4. Have any attempts been made to collect such values on a systematic or scientific basis? If not, why not?
5. Prestigious scientific associations, as well as thousands of individual scientists internationally, assert that fluoridated tap water poses unacceptable risks to human health. It is for this reason, as well as on ethical grounds, that other EU member states do not fluoridate their water supplies. There are many quality peer-reviewed scientific studies associating serious health risks with fluoridated tap water. Why does the Irish Department of Health believe that it is safe to ignore the growing body of international scientific opinion which holds that fluoridated water presents an unacceptable danger to human health?
6. Considering that Irish people are consuming fluoride from other sources as well as from tap water, how can the Dept of Health guarantee that individual citizens in Ireland – including vulnerable sub-groups such as women with babies in utero, newborn infants, people with particular illnesses, and children with disabilities (for example, who are unable to spit out toothpaste) – are not ingesting a higher than recommended level of fluoride?
7. Is the Dept aware of the studies showing that prevalence of dental fluorosis (white marks, discolouration and, in some cases, weakening of the teeth) – representing chronic overexposure of the population to fluoride – is now endemic in Ireland? (‘Dental Fluorosis in Primary Teeth of 5-year-olds in Ireland’, O Mullane et al, paper presentation at American Association for Dental Research conference, San Antonio, USA, 2003; ‘Fluoride Metabolism and Fluorosis’, Browne et al, Journal of Dentistry, Volume 33 Issue 3, March 2005; Verkerk, ‘The paradox of overlapping micronutrient risks and benefits obligates risk/benefit analysis’, Journal of Toxicology, Feb 2010)
8. Does the Dept accept that the high dental fluorosis rates prevalent indicate that Irish children are currently getting too much fluoride?
9. Why do the Minister and the Dept of Health believe that it is safe to ignore the findings of international peer-reviewed studies that have found fluoride to be a neurotoxin, and that modest exposure lowers IQ in children in geographic areas with endemic fluorosis? (‘Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’ by Choi, Sun, Zhang and Grandjean, published online Environmental Health Perspectives on July 20, 2012)
EVIDENCE FOR DENTAL BENEFITS OF FLUOROIDATING TAP WATER
10. Considering that most dental researchers now concede, as did the European Commission Scientific Assessment on Fluoride in 2010, that the major benefit of fluoride in relation to dental health is TOPICAL not SYSTEMIC, is the Dept still justified in exposing the Irish population to fluoride systemically through drinking water?
11. What is the logic in exposing every tissue in the body – including the bones, the brain and the endocrine system – to a toxic substance, or a potentially toxic substance, when its benefit can be achieved topically via fluoridated toothpaste?
12. Has the Dept conducted or can it cite any randomised clinical trial that has conclusively demonstrated the effectiveness of water fluoridation in reducing tooth decay?
13. What primary published peer-reviewed studies (as opposed to reviews) have convinced the Dept that swallowing fluoride actually reduces tooth decay by a significant amount?
A COMMONSENSE ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY
14. Does the Minister agree that tooth decay is concentrated largely in families of low income? Why then is everyone else being subjected to the mandatory consumption of fluoride when there is no evidence that they need any dental treatment?
15. Would the Dept consider that it would make more sense to target children from low-income families with education for better dental hygiene and better diet, rather than forcing the entire population to drink a toxic, or potentially toxic, substance?
16. Why does the Department believe that force-feeding fluoride to the entire population represents a better option than initiating a campaign to get children to consume less sugar and take personal responsibility for care of
THE FLUORIDATING CHEMICALS
17. Is the Dept aware that, according to the European Commission, the toxicological characteristics of the chemicals used to fluoridate public water systems are inappropriately known? (EU Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks SCHER; Committee on Fluoride in Drinking Water, NRC, National Academy of Sciences; ‘Fate of Fluororsillicate Drinking Water Additives’, Edward Todd Urbansky, US EPA, 2002)
18. Based on numerous MSDS (material safety data sheets) it has been shown that one of the contaminants of these fluoridating chemicals is arsenic. Is the Dept aware that the US EPA considers that there is no safe level of exposure to arsenic because it is a known human carcinogen? (Forum on Fluoridation Review 2002; ‘Arsenic in Drinking Water’, WHO 2011; ‘Basic Information about Arsenic in Drinking Water’, US EPA)
19. What evidence has the Minister or the Dept that the use of these arsenic-contaminated industrial grade chemicals in the water will NOT increase the cancer rates in this country?
20. Does the Dept consider it justifiable to risk increasing cancer rates in order to possibly reduce tooth decay by a very small amount via ingestion, when topical treatment with fluoridated toothpaste is just as effective?
OVEREXPOSURE IN CHILDREN AND INFANTS
21. Is the Minister aware that according to two scientific reports (Irish Study, published in Caries Research, Sept-Oct 2004 and the EU Report from the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks, 2011), Irish children frequently exceed the upper limit set for fluoride consumption? Why does the Dept of Health consider this overexposure risk to children and infants to be acceptable?
FLUORIDATION POLICY AND THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE
22. In light of the many serious concerns over health risks raised by thousands of scientists and other experts, and a growing body of scientific evidence associating fluoride toxicity with harmful health effects, on what basis does the Dept of Health believe that the Irish State’s fluoridation policy conforms to the Precautionary Principle? (As an EU member state, Ireland is obliged to follow this principle.)
CLASSIFICATION OF FLUORIDE
23. Does the Dept classify sodium fluoride as a medicine? If not, how is it classified?
24. Does the Dept classify hydrofluorosilicic acid as a medicine? If not, how is it classified?
IS OUR FLUORIDATION POLICY LEGAL WITHIN THE EU?
As Minister, Alex White, told the Seanad on 30th January 2013 that hydrofluorosilicic acid added to Irish drinking water is supplied by Derivados del Fluor in Spain. It is our understanding that this product has not been clinically trialled and does not have a marketing authorisation in the EU. Since Irish fluoridation is based on the minister’s medical claim in the Seanad of ‘making teeth more resistant to decay in people of all ages’, why has the Dept of Health not obtained legal authorisation for this use of hydrofluorosilicic acid in the EU, as is required to comply with the Clinical Trials Directive (2001/20/EC) and Medicinal Products Directive 2001/83/EC?
25. Based on what appears to us to be an ongoing infringement of EU law, has the Dept. of Health sought a derogation from the European Commission? And if not, why not?
A NEW, INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE WATER FLUORIDATION POLICY
Irish fluoridation policy is based on the report produced in 2002 by the government-appointed Forum on Fluoridation.
This report was criticised by an international team of eleven scientists, all experts on the effects of fluoridation. These scientists stated: “In our view, by failing to assess properly all the evidence available in the international scientific literature, the (Irish) Forum wasted a valuable opportunity to fully engage the scientific case opposing fluoridation… We can only conclude that the aim of the authors of this report (the Forum’s) was not to study the evidence but to find ways to get around it. The report’s primary conclusion that there are no adverse health effects is not defensible and in our view is blatantly false.”
The scientists also concluded:
* The Fluoridation Forum report failed to address a number of recently published important studies of fluoridation.
* It failed to establish a significant clinical difference in dental decay between children living in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in Ireland and throughout largely non-fluoridated Europe.
* It failed to ‘deal convincingly with the issue of dental fluorosis’, ‘making several unsupportable assertions’.
* It failed to discuss the fact that certain individuals in a population are going to be ‘more sensitive and more vulnerable to fluoride’s toxic effects than others’.
* It failed to provide the necessary precautionary advice to mothers not to use infant formula made up with fluoridated tap water. Taking the above into account:
26. Why does the Department of Health insist on following the advice of an ‘Expert Body’ whose foundation document recommending ongoing fluoridation has been so roundly condemned by prestigious international scientific experts?
27. And finally, considering the criticism above, what is the reason for the Minister’s and the Department’s apparent resistance to establishing a fully independent inquiry into Ireland’s policy of mandatory fluoridation of the water supply, taking on board all the new scientific evidence for the harmful effects of fluoride that have emerged since 2002, when the recommendation for ongoing fluoridation in Ireland was made?
We've assembled your definitive online guide to the issue of water fluoridation in Ireland, including all of our extensive reports...Read More
An announcement is likely in the Dáil today, Hot Press has learned.Read More
The event will now take place on November 7 in The White Lady Art Gallery, 14 Wellington Quay, Dublin 2.Read More
Hot Press reports spark a new interest in the issue at the national broadcaster.Read More
In the new issue of Hot Press, Adrienne Murphy reveals evidence that a report carried out by the Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) into possible links between pollution and severe animal and human health problems in Askeaton, Co. Limerick was seriously flawed.Read More
As evidence of the toxic effects of fluoridation of the water supply in Ireland mounts, Hot Press has uncovered a report written in 2007 by the former Minister for the Environment John Gormley – which was effectively suppressed. Here, for the first time, he reveals what happened – and why. Meanwhile, the report is published for the first time today on hotpress.comRead More
The former Minister for the Environment, John Gormley, has spoken out for the first time about the fluoride report, which he produced – and which he believes was suppressed by the Dáil committee that commissioned it.Read More
In November 2012, Mr. Ehud Leshem, the former senior engineer in the Ministry of Health who was previously responsible for establishing the water fluoridation installations in Israel, took legal proceedings against the State in an effort to force the Government to end this controversial policy.Read More
Fluoridation of the water supply in Israel is to end by 2014, following a landmark decision by the country's highest judicial authorityRead More
In the latest edition of Hot Press, Adrienne Murphy puts 27 questions to the Food Safety Authority of Ireland on the levels of fluoride in our food and beverages.Read More
Fluoride figures in Food Safety Authority survey were up to nine years out of date. That is just one of the very strange anomalies that have begun to emerge in this latest chapter in the Hot Press Investigation.Read More
In a major development in our investigation into the policy of fluoridation, figures presented by the Food Safety Authority of Ireland have been described as “wildly inaccurate”...Read More
Along with Aisling Fitzgibbon AKA The Girl Against Fluoride and environmental scientist Declan Waugh, she presented her findings before members of Dáil Éireann.Read More
She appears alongside the 'Girl against Fluoride' as she takes her battle to The Grand Social in Dublin this Thursday evening.Read More
The campaign against fluoridation has been going for longer than many people realise. In a moving personal testimony, Iva Pocock pays tribute to her late father Robert – and prepares to appear before the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament...Read More
In a dramatic new twist in the fluoride story, fluoride contamination is putting the international sales of Irish food products at risk. Plus: Paolo Tullio opposes fluoridation...Read More
Increasingly, people are realising that there is no rational explanation for the policy of mass medication by fluoridation of the water supply. We need to act fast before the damage to our reputation gathers momentum...Read More
It was long before the Belfast Agreement. But the campaign against fluoridation in Northern Ireland united these political foes in a campaign that defeated British government plans to fluoridate the North. So why was this extraordinary rapport ignored in the South? asks campaign leader Walter Graham...Read More
While the mainstream media continues to under-report the growing concern in Ireland over the policy of mandatory water fluoridation, political opposition is steadily mounting to the ongoing mass-medication of the population.Read More
Citizens have voted to keep the public water supplies free of fluoridation chemicals...Read More
Six weeks ago, Hot Press presented a detailed set of 27 Questions on the mandatory fluoridation of the water supply in Ireland to the Minister of State at the Department of Health with responsibility for the policy, Alex White TD. Since then, there has been a further upsurge in the campaign against fluoridation, with a growing wave of international opposition being mirrored here. In the past month alone, Israel has decided to end its policy of mandatory fluoridation, while in Ireland, Skibbereen Town Council has voted to oppose the policy – and will be lobbying for a similar vote among town councils all over the country...Read More
You can lend support to their motion for cessation now.Read More
In a startling development in the fluoridation debate, the union representing 1,500 employees of the US EPA has revealed why they insist of access to fluoride free water for EPA employees...Read More
They're the third town council to call for an end to the mandatory fluoridation...Read More
Dublin's Laugh Out Loud comedy club is holding a fundraiser night for the 'Girl against fluoride campaign' this Wednesday.Read More
Alex White has answered the 27 Questions put to him by Hot Press.Read More
A second Town Council has voted to support the campaign to end the mandatory fluoridation of the water supply in Ireland.Read More
While the Junior Minister for Health Alex White was formulating the answers to the 27 Questions posed to him by Hot Press 37-06 (questions were published 28th March 2013, answers will be published in next Hot Press 37-09, to be published 9th May 2013), other official bodies are beginning to move against fluoride...Read More
The former Minster for Finance recalls his involvement in the 1963 High Court challenge on the constitutionality of fluoridation of water...Read More
Japanese Journal of Epidemiology Study demonstrates link between fluoride exposure and uterine cancer...Read More
Dr. Philippe Grandjean, adjunct Professor of Environmental Health at Harvard University has highlighted fluoride as one of a menu of chemicals identified as dangerous to brain toxicity.Read More
For the first time, former Minister for Finance, Richie Ryan, has spoken about his role in the 1963 constitutional case, taken against the mandatory fluoridation of water in Ireland. Startling new evidence suggests that the judgement may have been unsound…Read More
Health Minister Yael German has decided to end the mandatory fluoridation of Israel's drinking water within a year...Read More
Following the publication of 27 Questions to the Minister in charge of fluoridation policy Alex White, in the last issue, Hot Press delivered the questions in person last week...Read More
After considering the evidence, Daniel M. Merfeld, Ph.D. Professor of Otology and Laryngology at Harvard Medical School states that fluoridation is ineffective...Read More
When Aisling FitzGibbon was alerted to the toxic nature of fluoride, she removed it from her drinking water – with remarkable results in terms of improved health. Now she is taking a case against Ireland’s mandatory fluoridation...Read More
Hot Press' Adrienne Murphy calls on Junior Minister Alex White to hold independent inquiry into Ireland's fluoridation policy...Read More
The drinking water consumed by the Irish population is systematically laced with the known neurotoxin fluoride, a policy numerous eminent specialists believe poses a grave danger to the health of men, women and children.Read More
"I started filtering my water, underwent a de-tox programme and came off all medications. My energy levels had collapsed, but they started coming back up, and my whole system started to regenerate. After seven months, I was completely better."Read More
Ireland has the sickest population in Europe. This country is also the only one in the EU which engages in mandatory flouridation of the water. Here, we present the astonishing evidence which conclusively links these two facts. So why, asks scientist Declan Waugh, have the authorities refused to address an issue that is crucial to the health of the nation?Read More
Paddy Casey, one of Ireland's leading singer songwriters, has come out strongly in support of the campaign against the fluoridation of the water supply in Ireland. The facts about this long-standing practice were exposed for the first time in the current issue of Hot Press.Read More
Hot Press investigates how water flouridation is affecting the health of the nation's people...Read More