not a member? click here to sign up

Prickly Questions

I was listening to a TV discussion of sexuality the other night when one of those women comedians with a sharp line in anti-man routines said, "The trouble with men is that they can't control their penises", which was maybe the hundredth time I'd heard the same point made by the same sort of person but the first time it ever occurred to me that, as a matter of fact, it's true.

Eamonn McCann, 01 Feb 2001

I was listening to a TV discussion of sexuality the other night when one of those women comedians with a sharp line in anti-man routines said, "The trouble with men is that they can't control their penises", which was maybe the hundredth time I'd heard the same point made by the same sort of person but the first time it ever occurred to me that, as a matter of fact, it's true.

Men can wiggle their toes. Try it. Send a message

from your mind to your toes to wiggle and they will.

Say to your fingers to drum out a tattoo on the table

and they'll go thrumm-thrumm. Nod your head, blink, wink, purse lips, waggle your elbows, eyebrows, in,

out, in, out, shake it all about. All and any of the other fleshy appendages of the body will respond to an instruction to move it. Some chaps I know can even flutter their ear-lobes to hip-hop rhythms late at night in Sandino's when Kwa is on sounds.

But you can't command the penis to stand up. You can take it in hand, contrive conducive circumstances, focus your mind on facilitative imagery, and probably, eventually, soon or late, it'll rise. But you won't make it happen just by saying it should. The penis is the appendage that men can't control.

Wherein lies the significance?, I ask myself. There must - mustn't there? - be an evolutionary purpose to this state of non-affairs. Why are the feature pages of our broadsheet newspapers filled with puffery on the putative mysteries of the female arts and parts but contain nothing at all to elucidate the paradoxical enigma of the unbiddable prick?

What does it all mean? Is this yet another example of the implacable refusal of the feminised junta to acknowledge the vulnerability of men? Was that woman on television not so much jibing at our dominance as gloating at our helplessness? Is there to be no end to the unspoken oppression under which millions of males have screamed silently for aeons?

I have to confess I don't know the answer to any of these questions. But I bet Rich Zubady does.

Related Content

Latest Articles by Eamonn McCann

Seeing Sense In The War On Drugs

A small developing nation is the latest to point out the futility of trying to ban substances that are readily available to millions...


2013-03-11

Pride Is Great, But Where's The Anger?

Gay Pride is a celebration of sexual diversity – but it is important not to forget the need for a clenched fist


2012-08-27

True Bro-mance

She’s a busy actor with a Hollywood career of long-standing. So how did Bronagh Gallagher find the time to record a cracking new solo record?


2012-06-13

Murder In An Irish Town

In September 1988, John Gallagher drove to Lifford, collected a rifle from behind the wardrobe in his father’s bedroom and headed for Sligo, where he murdered his ex-girlfriend Anne Gillespie, and her mother Annie. When the case came to court John Gallagher pleaded – and was found – guilty but insane and he was remanded to the Central Mental Hospital in Dundrum. In July 2000, Gallagher successfully escaped from Dundrum and absconded to England, before returning to Northern Ireland, where he was able to live freely, because of the unique absence of an extradition treaty for people in his position. Earlier this month, in a bizarre twist, apparently in the hope of taking advantage of a bequest from his father, Gallagher turned up at the Central Mental Hospital and handed himself in. It’s open to him to apply to the Health Review Board for release on the grounds that he does not now suffer from a mental illness. The Minister for Justice, Alan Shatter, has already acknowledged the possibility that he might be released within a matter of weeks. But as far back as 1991, in a special investigation carried out for Hot Press, Eamonn McCann questioned the original verdict of the court – and whether Gallagher was ever ‘insane’ within the meaning intended by the act. In the light of the growing controversy about the case, we reprint here in full the extraordinary story as it was originally published in Hot Press.


2012-06-12

What's The Problem With Gay Marriage

Plus: the Champions League is decadent and depraved...


2012-03-28

Contact Us

Hot Press,
13 Trinity Street,
Dublin 2.
Rep. Of Ireland
Tel: +353 (1) 241 1500

Email:info@hotpress.ie

Click here for more contact information.

Click here to find out more about Hot Press

Hot Press always welcomes feed back so if you've got something to tell us click here.

Advertise With Us

For more detail on how to advertise with Hot Press click here or call us on +353 (1) 241 1540